law – US-Brazil Business Opportunities

The lawyers Alexander Dobiasch & Rupert Richter informed after a separation remains the child is usually a parent. Basically a deal entitled the other parent with the child. There are exceptions here only if the treatment is not the best interests of the child. Rights is regulated in 1684 BGB. First and foremost, this is to understand as the child’s own right. A scheme for the rights to make can be part of the divorce dispute part of legal advice. Alexander Dobiasch and Rupert Richter from Bergen auf Rugen, the lawyers inform about rights of access.

Right of the child to both parents following a separation, usually a parent receives custody. The other is the possibility of a visit with rights of access. This is in the interest of the child, which has a right to maintain a stable relationship with both parents. Rights can regulate such visits, that the other parent may on certain days and times visit the child and to take. Third parties such as grandparents, life partner or siblings receive BG access rights according to 1666.

The prerequisite for this is that these people live longer with the child in community and determined that the deal contributes to the welfare of the child. Legal advice helps prevent disputes often dispute arises after a separation of custody and rights of access for the children. To avoid disputes, a legal consultancy that brings together all stakeholders can engage supportive. As so reliable dates for both sides meet, without any clashes. In addition, a legal advice helps to fully exploit the possibilities of the right to visit and to meet a regulation within the meaning of the child. For detailed information about the rights lawyers Alexander Dobiasch and Rupert Richter from mountains are on Rugen anytime available.

Consulting and documentation requirements in the insurance mediation in one of the first decisions has the Saarland higher regional court (judgment of January 27, 2010 reference number: 5 U 337/09) to the burden at the consulting and documentation requirements in the insurance brokerage commented. Content and scope of a conversation between the customer and agent are disputed, the so-called secondary burden of explanation is”it when the insurance intermediary, that a proper content and scope of education and counselling is done, according to the Court. Missing a documentation of said information as well as the recommendations and warnings, so the judge in Saarbrucken, Germany must be assumed according to mandatory, that a consultation actually not or have occurred only to the stipulated extent. Rather, the mediator then meets the burden of proof, can lead the proof then that he has advised about the documentation, or by way of derogation. Because in the taking of evidence by the Court, the argument of the agent can then also a testimony confirmed by be. Nathan Gaude Elliot Davis has much to offer in this field. In such a situation, the customer then not having success could rebuke the (so-called non-liquet situation) the taking of evidence have achieved no clear result, so the German higher regional court. The decision underscored how rigid burden at the consulting and documentation requirements in the insurance brokerage is”, GPC specialised so lawyer Dietmar Goerz of insurance intermediaries law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH.

In a court case, only an informative advice documentation or a good witness helps the mediator. In the defendant insurance brokers had underlying the decision of the German Court of appeal case of good luck. He could compensate for the poor documentation of advice through the testimony of a salaried employee again. This must not always so run “, says the Berlin lawyer. With the law in 2007 a special became the new regulation of insurance intermediaries legislation in the insurance contract Act (VVG) Basis for a claim for damages introduced (section 63 VVG).